I say this should be scaled back to a simple character description - even Langdon only gets one line. Someone has edited it so that Vayentha's character passage is huge, describing in detail her part in the story. Wzrd1 ( talk) 05:34, 21 July 2013 (UTC) Length of Vayentha passage Small hint, bacteria also are infected by various virus kinds, bacteria are unable to infect a virus. More simply, people, the evening news gets it wrong half of the time. To be blunt, I'm only rather annoyed at wasting a night reading the novel to find the fact that a bacteria was not the cause, as this article proclaimed, but was due to a virus that was designed to cause sterility in 1/3 of humanity, which is a special kind of magic reserved for authors of fiction. Competent authors know this and use a virus as a vector, as this author did. Bacteria can cause some genetic issues, but not many. Sum mer PhD ( talk) 16:53, (UTC) Surely a person who wants to avoid spoilers will simply skip over the plot summary? Massive inaccuracy in the article vs both the novel and biology įirst, I removed the nonsense about bubonic plague, that was mentioned frequently, but was not the plague induced by the "mad scientist". The plot is encyclopedic information, including whodunit.
INFERNO DAN BROWN MANILA TV
Again, this novel is like thousands of other novels, movies, TV shows, lyric poems, limericks, knock knock jokes, etc. "Ethically" you've decided that one particular piece of one novel is sacred, but exploding Death Stars, farm girls returning to Kansas and Keyser/Verbal's identity isn't? Interesting concept. The climax is just like any other plot point. Offensive to the author? That's a shame, but he'll wipe his tears with his millions and somehow manage to go on with his life in his solid gold mansion with unobtainium toilets. Yes, the climax of the novel is revealed. If you feel we should, you will either need to change this project wide (expunging Rosebud is a sled, Darth is Luke's father, she is a he, the South loses, everybody dies, Jesus comes back, etc.) -or- provide a compelling reason why this case is different from all of those (spoiler: it isn't). Shreyas1011 ( talk) 09:00, (UTC)shreyasg1011 We do not remove spoilers. Moreover, ethically, giving such detailed spoilers does not seem good to me, as to a reader, the climax should be known entirely from the book, and not from somewhere else. This article reveals the climax of the novel and thus may seem even offensive to the author as it may violate copyright and royalty rights. Thought WP:spoiler terms a spoiler as another form of text, but it's a different case here.
I agree to the previous comment over removal of spoilers.
INFERNO DAN BROWN MANILA LICENSE
Personally, Brown has a habit of taking poetic license to the extremes of the 007 character's license to kill, killing the facts mercilessly in order to plod the story along. As for the work being a good read, that is WP:OR, as a good read is a subjective experience. please it ruins a good read when the reader already know the twists that Langdon faces when he gets to know about FS- 2080 and Dr. TNKS, Charles Edwin Shipp ( talk) 11:02, 29 June 2013 (UTC) Remove spoilers from this article
However, I found your thoughts interesting. Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.29.129.105 ( talk) 12:38, 7 June 2013 (UTC) The purpose of this talk page Ī Talk page in Wikipedia is a relating page to the article itself for the purpose of improving the article, not as a discussion forum on whether you like the Dan Brown action novel or not. Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.149.122.155 ( talk) 09:53, 2 June 2013 (UTC) Bad research Īt one point reference is made to putting Pandora back in the box, Pandora was never in a box, she was the one who opened it to let out all the troubles of the world. Articles on fiction in Wikipedia often have such paragraphs. Can we remove it? Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 17:29, (UTC) When referring to fiction, nothing is OR. Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.200.153 ( talk) 12:56, (UTC) Factual inaccuracies and controversies Īpart from the Manila thing, this looks like OR and largely undue. The secrecy of the translation is just a display of stupid spamming.